Last week the sentence came down: Death to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.
The verdict, zealously sought by federal prosecutors, dispels any right-wing pretense that the United States is a "Christian" nation. Or it ought to, anyway.
Consider: Tsarnaev is no longer a legitimate threat to others. Live or die, the man will never again be able to harm anyone. Not even himself. Howsoever long his life may last, he will spend his days in a prison cell, isolated from humanity. If he lacks remorse, as the prosecution asserted, he will have ample opportunity to learn it in the long years of emptiness that await him. (Ask Sirhan Sirhan about that!) And if he did somehow maintain his hatred over the course of his life? If he continued his defiance and anger? Would that not be a fate worse than death? Decades of impotent rage! God save us all!
None of this is to say that human beings should not do what they can to protect themselves. For example, in the case of Osama bin Laden, death was necessary for a dangerous man who remained a threat to civilization. There was small difference between him and a renegade grizzly bear (an analogy I've made before.)
But how quickly do we desert our purported faiths in favor of primal satisfaction? (I refer Christians to Matthew 5:39).
Fifty-eight percent of the residents of the (very blue and very Catholic) state of Massachusetts, including family members of some of the victims, oppose the sentence. But in the larger pool of the United States' general citizenry 53% support it. And the justice system came down on their side.
It's a fascinating and revealing phenomenon. And, make no mistake: the sentence is not about Tsarnaev or even what he did.
It's about us. It's about who we are.
Killing this man fulfills some primal need humans have for vengeance. It's residual behavior from our Stone Age state-of-existence. In the ~10,000 years since civilizations first arose, there has been much progress, but barbarous relics like the death penalty remain.
We're not a Christian nation. Can we let go of that ridiculous notion?
2 comments:
According to Plutarch, Numa Pompilius created the position of Pontifex Maximus (The Pope) at least 7 centuries before Christ, when burnt offering were all the rage: so should we even consider Catholicism to be a Christian religion?
Secondly, for most the inhabitants, this country, like just about any other in the world, religions are more about group identity than an actual practice across the aggregate. How many of those Catholics actually practice the way of Jesus?
Our real collective religion at the moment seems to be Capitalistic Social Darwinism, which appears to have human sacrifice as one of it's central tenants.
I mean really, what is the difference between Mayans sacrificing people on top of pyramids for more favorable conditions and Bankers and Captains of industry sending our kids to war for more profit? As I see it they are the same, and it does not matter what you call yourself, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, unless you are extremely devout, you are practicing the religion of the current power structure.
So yes, I agree, this is not a Christian nation.
Your post makes a good point, Dade. So does Paul's comment, although I take exception to the idea that Catholics aren't Christian.
Post a Comment