I believe that the search for Truth (or God, or Whatever-You-Choose-to-Call-It) is similar to a calculus expression. That is, let Absolute Truth = ∞; and let X = Human Comprehension. The search for Truth might be expressed thusly:
lim {X -> ∞} f(x) = X/∞ = 0
Or, to put it another way: Truth is incomprehensible to the human mind. It is beyond our capacity to understand. The best we can do is approach It, just as X approaches ∞. And no matter how close we get, we remain infinitely far away.
Such belief, of course, requires a degree of faith. More faith, in fact, than is required to derive a literal interpretation of scripture. By acknowledging that Truth is unknown and ultimately unknowable, one must accept that, at any moment in the journey through life, a sudden epiphany may render ridiculous all of one's previous assumptions and tenets. Enlightenment is never absolute.
So, regardless of the method we use to approach the Truth, be it Hindu mysticism, Buddhist tranquility, or strict adherence to the rigid dogma of the Children of Abraham, (any of which is as valid a method as any other) we cannot arrive at the Destination.
This, I suppose, is why I find objectionable so much of what passes for religion in the world. Bible-thumping hypocrites, jihad warriors waving the Koran, and the brutal descendants of fanatic Simon Zealotes all seem to believe they have arrived at Truth. They've stopped looking for It. Instead, they try to compel others to believe as they do.
Well, as a scion of this little corner of humanity's domain, where religion is largely viewed as a private matter, I reject all that.
I'm an Oregon agnostic, seeking with the full knowledge that I will never arrive. Forty-eight years into it, and I'm still looking.
How about you, dear reader? How does it seem to you? I'm listening.
Note to Anonymous poster: The f(x) of my equation is X/∞ . X does not approach 0, it approaches infinity. And anything divided by infinity = 0, which is the point I was trying to make with this post.